Showing posts with label Just saying. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Just saying. Show all posts

Thursday, March 14, 2013

5 mistakes of my life I learnt thanks to Chetan Bhagat


Don't bat your eyelashes no more. Reuters

Don’t bat your eyelashes no more. Reuters

Piyasree Dasgupta: First Post : Mar 13, 2013
I have never cared much for Chetan Bhagat. 
Like I haven’t for Ram Gopal Verma, size zero, cats and what the nation wants to know. 
Until of course, one fine weekend, when the world was still nursing a dizzying hangover from women’s day discounts and free shots, Bhagat turned fairy godfather.
 And just before we drowned ourselves in weight loss teas and confidence boosting air bras, Bhagat killed our inner Rihanna  with the chop of a word.
 A few words actually, specifically these: “Your success is what will finally make Indian men respect women. Play your part.”
The last time I had “I can be your hero” playing in my head before this, was when I was 14. Such immense, complete joy, I tell you, could only be replicated by the sight of Rekha feeding Kabir Bedi to the crocodiles in Khoon Bhari Maang. No, seriously.
If you, like me, had mistaken yourself for a somewhat sensible woman who pays her own bills, can shoulder as much responsibility at work as any male colleague and can also manage her finances pretty well by herself , here’s the bitter truth: You’re not at all what you think you are.
In his column called The Underage Optimist in the Times of India, Bhagat shows you the mirror.
“The first behaviour that needs to end is the constant desire to judge other women”
I agree. We Indian women should stop pretending like we live in a Gossip Girl blog. Calling each other ‘sluts’ if the other wears a short skirt, with a sense of discretion equal to that possessed by a cockroach and the morals of Cinderella’s step sisters, we should totally stop being mean. This might sound like a very mothballed stereotype, but face it, if Bhagat is saying it, that’s what we are!
‘Second, the faking needs to end’. Again, I agree.
Bhagat says. “What’s the point of collectively harping on equality, when as individuals, you are happy to lapse into being clueless eye flutterers, just to keep men happy?”
Well, totally. Tiring, isn’t it? We might be making PPTs, coding softwares, writing reports, attending meetings and subjecting ourselves to other such work-life banalities, but all we care about is fluttering our eyelashes at the male boss or the senior colleague. We don’t quite know better ways that the cumbersome eye exercise to get ahead in life.
And yeah, what a bunch of emotional fools we are, really.  Bhagat says we are not serious about ‘standing up for (our) property rights’. So what if we manage our own finances, have separate bank accounts after marriage, make investments, save money, buy property ourselves, we are more keen on giving away land and houses as freebies to evil husbands, sons and brothers who have no qualms about taking away what is rightfully ours. We are actually soggy little Nirupa Roys deep within.
And yes, if you were convinced that a having a woman boss only gets a man’s goat – wake up, it doesn’t! ‘Success’ is the only way to earn a man’s respect, says Bhagat. “Women need to become more ambitious and dream bigger,” to quote him exactly.
We aren’t ambitious enough. We, who stay up nights to crack horrifying exams, troop to universities and corporate houses as much as men, know Miss India speeches are a lot of gas; actually don’t have enough fire in our bellies. I can’t think of what makes men more ambitious than us. But he must be right, he is Chetan Bhagat.
And as Bhagat puts it, a man’s respect is the new Bournville in your life sisters – there’s no easy way to earn it.
Finally, don’t take Karan Johar too seriously people. It is not about the family. It’s about you. Since Bhagat assumes that while you might be reading his column, you must also be living the life of the women seen in washing powder commercials, wake up and realise that ‘you have a life too’. The whole multi-tasking, super mom concept is just a bunch of lies.
And yes, we laugh unnecessarily at bad jokes. If you have been wondering why Santa Banta jokes survived till now, hear it from him: because we women never stop laughing at a bad joke to please the men folk of this world.
Thank you Mr Chetan Bhagat.
 For telling me who I am and changing my life forever.
 I don’t need Fair and Lovely anymore…

Monday, March 11, 2013

What’s with ET’s new masthead?


So this is how one reads the name (for today, at least): “The Economic & Political Times”.
So this is how one reads the name (for today, at least): “The Economic & Political Times”.

by Anant Rangaswami :first Post :11 Mar 2013
“For decades, ET’s political coverage has informed, explained and amused you, its sharp insights giving you a ringside view of the grand theatre of Indian politics. Starting today, we expand our coverage by adding another page of politics as part of a refreshed offering of political content…, The Economic Times says in a front page explanatory note.
The note is required – as this is what this morning’s masthead looks like:

So this is how one reads the name (for today, at least): “The Economic & Political Times”.
There’s obviously no change in the legal name for the newspaper – as far as the Registrar of Newspapers is concerned, it will remain The Economic Times.
So what causes ET to flag their political content now, when it is not content that they have decided to introduce from this morning – it is content that they have always carried. What their explanatory note underlines is that, henceforth, there will be two pages in the ET which focus on political developments. These two pages will be branded ‘Pure Politics’.
What will the content on these pages do? They “will give you everything to help connect the dots between people, politics and policy. It will be the distilled essence of political news that matters. You won’t need anything else,” says their note.
“You won’t need anything else,” helps one understand why they’re highlighting the political content. If one thinks of ET as just a business newspaper, then the reader will have to go elsewhere for his political news and analysis (if he believes ET does not give it to him). Considering the impact of politics on policy, industry and business, anyone in business needs, increasingly, to have a more than basic understanding of likely developments in the political arena. How will an NDA government, if voted to power in the next general elections, view, for example, FDI in retail? What are the chances that the UPA government will continue to cut subsidies in the oil sector?
An understanding of the political environment will allow businessmen and industrialists to make more informed decisions on their investments and risks – and this is what ET wants to take advantage of.
Take the story which is alongside the explanatory note on ET’s front page today. “YSR Cong may back Congress post 2014,” the headline says. The news, if true, has significant impact on the fortunes of the UPA, considering that, in 2009, the Congress with YSR won 33 of the 42 Lok Sabha seats in Andhra Pradesh.
Such news would not significantly impact the reader of a general newspaper. But to the reader of a pink paper, it would suggest that the UPA’s prospects in 2014 are better than one might have thought before this morning’s ET.
And if the reader connects the dots, it would suggest that he covered his bases with the Congress and with other possible UPA constituents.