Thursday, January 23, 2014

The Spirit of J R D Tata : “To lead men, you have to lead them with affection.”


Quotes :

To lead men, you have to lead them with 

affection.” 


The Life and Times of  J  R  D  Tata  :

The leader and the motivator
The supportive climate he built developed entrepreneurs such as Sir Homi Mody, Sir Ardeshir Dalal, Sir Jehangir Ghandy, Russi Mody, Sumant Moolgaokar and Darbari Seth, and others who created billions in wealth for the group and the country.
It was an environment where scientists of international repute such as Homi Bhabha, leading lawyers such as J D Choksi and Nani Palkhivala, and economists such as John Matthai, A D Shroff, D R Pendse and Freddie Mehta could flourish.
This attitude contrasted sharply with the prevailing management styles of other Indian business leaders. Large Indian companies tend to fall into three categories: public sector ones run by the government, multinational affiliates, and those promoted by family dynasties. While the Tata Group firmly remained a family concern -- to date, four out of its five chairman have been Tatas -- JRD's professionalism stood out from the crowd.
Moreover, in most of the family firms, the top management tended to belong to the same community as the promoter family. With the Tatas, it was different: only merit counted.
Tata's role model in management was the British civil service. How was it, he wondered 'that a young Briton straight from college, could come to a foreign country and administer various departments with such distinction?'

 J R D Tata in his own words :


  • At the Crossroads.The effective execution of a Plan is what counts and not mere planning on paper; it is not what we put on our plate or even what we eat that provides nourishment and growth, but what we digest. 
  • (The Central Advisory Council of Industries, New Delhi, August 13, 1965)

RBI’s move to withdraw pre-2005 currency notes is anarchic

F P  S Murlidharan Jan 23, 2014
The Reserve Bank of India vide Press Release dated 22 January, 2014 advised that currency notes issued prior to 2005 would be withdrawn. From 1 April, 2014 public are advised to go to any bank whether they have account with it or not and get notes issued in 2005 or thereafter in exchange.
No questions or proof would be asked till 30 June 2014 when one approaches the banks for such exchange. However from 1 July 2014, one has to give proof of identity and address should he require more than ten pieces of pre-2005 Rs 500 or Rs 1,000 notes to be exchanged.
Representational image. AFP

The RBI has advised people not to panic at this action and that the pre-2005 notes can be easily identified because they simply do not bear the year of minting on their backs whereas notes issued in 2005 or thereafter bear the year on their backs.
The RBI is silent on many issues. What is the intention underpinning this move? Surely no demonetisation is on cards because even from 1 July, 2014 one can avoid the inconvenience of having to give proofs of identity and residence if he is prepared to go to as many bank branches as warranted.
To wit, suppose he has 20,000 Rs 500 notes, all that he has to do is to go to 2,000 different branches of banks in India and surrendering at each bank exactly ten notes for exchange. He can even allocate this disagreeable work among his family members and friends whom he trusts. In the event, one is at a loss to understand what exactly is sought to be achieved by this potentially disruptive move.
One can visualise the scene easily. Come 1 April, 2014 there would be serpentine queues at the cash counters of bank branches. The cashiers would have to look with magnifying glasses at each note surrendered given the fact that the year is printed in smallest font possible. More aggrieved by the move would be the common folks especially senior citizens whose eyesight is not so good.
The RBI has said that the old notes ie those issued prior to 2005 would be legal tender. For how long? Well, this aspect has been kept open-ended. Let us say the deadline is in due course set as 31 December, 2014 which would mean from 1 January, 2015, pre-2005 currency would no longer be legal tender. Now the entire economy would be in turmoil.
People hitherto have been counting notes given to them in a banking or trade transaction besides of course displaying their knowledge real or pretended of telling between a fake and real currency. They would now have to do another thing — see if the notes given to them are post 2004 and for this purpose those endowed with poor eyesight may have to carry a magnifying glass in their pockets at all times. Each note has to be carefully checked. Those with poor eyesight would feel this extremely challenging and inconvenient.
One can say by the deadline date more than say 95% of old currency notes would have been surrendered to the banking system but there is an outside chance that some of the notes no longer legal tender are still in circulation. People don’t like to take chances. They would not be reassured by the official position that all old currencies have been flushed out.
The RBI’s disruptive move begs the most important question — why this anarchic financial move when so much leeway has been given to the black moneyed people? One could have understood had no wiggle room whatsoever had been given. But exception given upto 10 high denomination notes of 500 and 1,000 is bound to be lapped up with alacrity. The leg work involved in going to more than one branch would hardly deter them when it has not deterred them for avoiding TDS. Bank branches are required to deduct tax at source on interest from term deposits only if the interest from a branch exceeds Rs 10,000 during a financial year.
Let Baba Ramdev not exult and open the bubbly err... the amla bottle because the quasi demonetisation scheme, as it were, warts and all, does not target only high denomination notes namely 500 and 1000 but currency notes of all denominations including 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100,  unless the Finance Ministry and RBI are working on a secret plan of demonetisation and would give in exchange denominations other than 500 or 1,000, come 1 April, 2014. Should that happen the RBI would have on the all fools day pulled off the most brilliant if cunning plan ever which of course would be marred by the leeway discussed above —exchange of high denomination notes upto 10 at any branch without any questions being asked.
If this is what the plan is, it should forthwith close the loophole and say even one note has to be explained for, come 1 July 2014. Black moneyed people may also hit upon another counterblast — start accumulating small denominations notes right away. Who knows in the run up to 1 April, 2014 the country might witness shortage of small denomination notes. They may even be bought at a premium.

RBI to withdraw currency notes issued before 2005


Live mint 23 jan 2014
Mumbai: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Wednesday said it will completely withdraw from circulation all bank notes issued before 2005, without elaborating on the reason but assuring there was no reason to panic.
These notes can be identified easily as these notes do not have the year of printing mentioned on them, RBI said in a statement. The currency notes will have to be exchanged at banks from 1 April. The facility will be open in all banks till further notice, RBI said. The central bank, however, cautioned that from 1 July, “to exchange more than 10 pieces of Rs.500 and Rs.1,000 notes, non-customers will have to furnish proof of identity and residence to the bank branch in which she/he wants to exchange the notes.”
While clarifying that the notes issued before 2005 will continue to be legal tender, “the Reserve Bank has appealed to the public not to panic. They are requested to actively co-operate in the withdrawal process.”
The RBI is withdrawing currency notes issued prior to 2005 to ensure that the notes in circulation are of similar design. “Prior to 2005 we had different colour of notes like Rs500 notes were in blue, yellow and green. Since then there has been a single Mahatma Gandhi series issued, so this withdrawal will ensure rationalization of the notes in circulation,” an RBI official said, requesting anonymity.
Bankers said notes issued in more recent years have stronger security features, which help check counterfeiting. While the RBI regularly adds new features to notes, some of which are publicised while others are not, one notable feature introduced in 2006 was the anti-xeroxing security feature in the Rs50, Rs100, Rs500 and Rs1,000 notes.
“Notes before 2005 could have some secret features that the counterfeiters have got to know and sorting out counterfeited notes could be a problem area for RBI,” said the chairman of a large bank who did not wish to be named. “The latest notes may still be impregnable because of higher security features.”
The RBI has a clean-money policy that mandates dirty notes to be replaced with cleaner notes. According to bankers, the latest withdrawal could be more to do with this clean money policy. According to the RBI’s annual report, around 14.1 billion soiled bank notes (20.4% of notes in circulation) were processed and removed from circulation during 2012-13.
.