21 Feb 2009
Following an Orissa High Court order, the CBI has started
investigation into the role of banks in multi-crore foreign
exchange losses suffered by customers, who bought derivative
products sold by the banks. Sources said while CBI has already
questioned the officials of a top public sector bank, it might
call officials from other banks too for questioning.
The agency will conduct investigations into the dealings of 22 banks.
Meanwhile, sources said the Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) was
likely to file a petition with the Supreme Court for a stay on the CBI probe.
The high court directive in December was in response to a
writ petition filed against the government by an individual alleging
that banks were selling products on the basis of a wrong forecast
hat the rupee will strengthen against the dollar. Both CBI and the
Enforcement Directorate (ED) submitted their preliminary reports last November.
Banks are alleged to have offered structures in violation of “extant”
regulations, which resulted in increased risk and net receipt of premium.
Besides, the lenders did not verify the underlying exposure, the
Reserve bank of India (RBI) in its report to CBI had said.
The RBI report had pointed out that banks failed to
carry out proper due diligence regarding user appropriateness
and suitability of the product offered. Besides, the banks
did not obtain written acknowledgement from the clients about
their understanding of the risk involved.
The booking of contract between banks and customers took
place on the past performance basis beyond the 50 per cent
eligibility limit and also without obtaining a certificate from
a chartered accountant.
“Even when the transactions were based on
underlying exposure, the banks relied on photocopies of documents…
This led to misuse by clients who used photocopies of the same
underlying to enter into different contracts with different banks,
which resulted in manifold increase in their losses,”
the summary of RBI report submitted by CBI said.
CBI contended during the high court proceedings that
the derivative contract entered into by various banks might
be looked into by RBI and ED on bank-to-bank basis and,
if the exercise revealed commission of offense under the I
ndian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act,
then CBI may look into the case.
Though RBI in its report has maintained that
“losses suffered by the customers may not represent
the gains made by the banks” and that the issues were not
“systemic”, it said that an inquiry by the inter-departmental group had
“identified violations which were serious in nature and were being
examined for further action against the banks concerned”.