Monday, June 13, 2011

Audit glare on SBI provisions





The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has asked the State Bank of India — the country’s largest commercial bank — to explain the reasons for the surge in the provisions it made against bad loans in its results for the fourth quarter ended March 31.

The SBI had raised its provisions against bad loans by 49 per cent to Rs 3,264 crore from Rs 2,187 crore in the year-ago period. Total provisions at the bank rose 82 per cent to Rs 6,059 crore during the same period.

The sharp jump in provisions was the principal reason behind the PSU banking giant reporting a net profit of Rs 21 crore compared with Rs 1,867 crore in the same period last year.
The resultant fall in the SBI’s profits drew a caustic remark from RBI deputy governor K.C. Chakrabarty recently. Although Chakrabarty did not name the bank, he said whenever the chairman of a bank retired, its profits went down as the successor wanted to start with a clean slate.

“If we don’t audit or create the standard then anybody will report anything that will not be meaningful and nobody will rely on that. Books should not be as per the minds of the chairman but reporting should be as per books,” he had said.

It is now learnt that the accounting regulator will soon take up the reasons behind the rise in provisions at the SBI during the fourth quarter, not only with the bank, but also with its auditors.
ICAI president G. Ramaswamy was quoted as saying that a letter would be sent to the SBI asking it to state the reasons that led to the increase in provisions in the March quarter.
The letter is expected to be sent within a week and further action will depend on the SBI’s response, the ICAI chief added. It, however, could not be ascertained as to whether the accounting regulator will look into specifics such as the jump in provisions for NPAs or its overall provisioning procedures.

Meanwhile, the SBI has also breached the Reserve Bank of India’s credit exposure norms with respect to loans it provided to Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) in the past three consecutive years.
In its annual report, the SBI has disclosed that its credit to RIL was in excess of the limits prescribed under the RBI’s prudential credit norms. The bank added that apart from RIL, Indian Oil Corporation and Bhel were the other two clients who had benefited from a breach in the prudential credit limits.

Under the RBI norms, loan exposure to any entity has to be capped at 15 per cent of capital funds in the case of a single borrower and 40 per cent of capital funds in the case of a borrower group.

However, the exposure to a single borrower can go up to 20 per cent if the additional 5 per cent is on account of extension of credit to infrastructure projects.

No comments:

Post a Comment