Showing posts with label NPAs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NPAs. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Banks' gross NPAs rise to 3.85%, PSBs lag: CARE

Banks' gross NPAs rise to 3.85%, PSBs lag: CARE
Jul 28, 2014, 09.44 PM IST | Source: PTI

Its estimate is based on the study of the 26 state-owned banks as well as 13 from the private sector, including all the big banks.
With lenders continuing to be under pressure on asset quality, CARE Ratings today said the gross non-performing assets of banks increased to 3.85 percent as on March 2014 and will deteriorate further to 4 percent by the end of March 2015.
Its estimate is based on the study of the 26 state-owned banks as well as 13 from the private sector, including all the big banks.
"Overall Gross NPA Ratio has risen from 3.26 per cent as on March 31, 2013 to 3.85 per cent as on March 31, 2014," CARE said in a report.
The 3.85 percent number would have been higher by 0.30 percent, but for the sale of over Rs 10,000 crore of assets by the banks to the asset reconstruction companies in the latter part of the recently concluded fiscal, it said.
A December 2014 report by the Reserve Bank had pegged the overall system's gross NPA at 4.2 percent in September 2013, and estimated that it will grow to 4.6 percent in September 2014 and recover to 4.4 per cent by March 2015.
The slack economic growth (the country has witnessed two consecutive years of sub-5 per cent growth), high interest rates due to the pressure on the inflation front and trouble on projects both due to clearances and judicial interventions have been blamed for the high NPAs.
With a new pro-reforms government taking charge, analysts have been saying that there will be a surge in the growth. "However, the improvement (on NPAs) would be gradual and would reflect in the second half of FY15. The Gross NPA ratio is estimated to be marginally higher at around 4 per cent by end of FY15," the domestic agency said.

Private banks continue to outperform the state-run ones on the asset quality front. "The gross NPAs of public sector banks increased by 38.2 per cent, while that of the private sector banks was comparatively lower at 13.6 per cent. The gross NPA of the state-run banks stood at 4.33 per cent as on March 2014 as against the 1.82 per cent for the private sector ones," it said.

Monday, December 16, 2013

What RBI’s NPA move really mean: Govt control on banks should go

PTI
FP  Rajesh Pandathil Dec 16, 2013
If you were wondering why public sector banks have higher NPAs than their private sector counterparts, a report in The Economic Timestoday may give you an answer.
According to the report, often the loan sanctioning process in a state-owned bank involves just one step—phone call from a senior official to a junior staff, says the report.
The Indian Bank.’ Association has urged banks to take steps to stop such practices, the report says.
“During some vigilance complaints it was reported that loans were initially sanctioned on verbal orders. This had led to discrepancy as junior officers had claimed that they had sanctioned loans after receiving orders to expedite the case from senior authorities,” a senior government official has been quoted as saying in the report.

No wonder, there has been an alarming rise in bank NPAs. According to the finance ministry data, gross NPAs of public sector banks had declined to 2.09 percent in 2008-09 from 14 percent in 2000. Ever since, the figure has again been rising. As of June, the gross NPA of nationalised banks was nearly 4 percent—Rs 1.92 lakh crore. This is a steady increase from Rs 1.64 lakh crore in March.
More alarming is the increase in bad loans restructuring, an exercise that dress them up like a performing asset. According to the RBI data, in 2012-13 the number of loans restructured under corporate debt restructuring mechanism rose 37 percent. The amount restructured thus surged 52 percent.
The authorities are slowly but surely waking up to the reality. A reportin the Business Standard says the Reserve Bank of India is planning to put in place new norms to help banks spot non-performing assets early on and deal with them.
The report says the RBI will force banks to profile a borrower at the very first instance of a default. Further, a panel of lenders’ consortium will vet decisions taken on loans of Rs 100 crore or more. This move is expected to curb restructuring. Another step being considered is giving incentives to banks which identify potential NPAs early on.
The norms being mulled are pre-emptive in nature. They are aimed at encouraging banks to spot an NPA early on and taking necessary measures.
But that is not all. They also have pointers to the government.
As is evident from the instances mentioned in the ET report, the increase in non-performing assets in public sector banks is also a fallout of the bad governance, stemming from the government’s excessive control over them.
The senior official who coerces the junior staff to sanction a loan might as well be acting on the behest of a political boss. It is crony capitalism at its best.
The government’s control over banks has adverse impact not only on their governance. They take a toll on their business too. How many times have the finance minister pushed banks to cut interest rates even though the interest rates in the economy are on an upmove?
Moreover, as Firstpost’s R Jagannathan argues in this article, the government’s firm grip on its banks is killing innovation in the banking sector.
“…Government ownership is the biggest barrier to innovation. It is impacting the pace of innovation even in private sector banks because competition is weak from public sector banks.”
If the authorities are serious about bringing down the NPAs, they should first bring down the government’s control over banks.
It would be good if the government remembers what Raghuram Rajansaid about wilful defaulters.
“Promoters do not have a divine right to stay in charge regardless of how badly they mismanage an enterprise, nor do they have the right to use the banking system to recapitalise their failed ventures.”

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

BANKER’S TRUST REALTIME | Banks’ obsession for ‘total business’


The ideal way of demonstrating a bank’s growth is growth in assets and not “total business”—a metric no bank uses in any part of the globe except India. Photo: Hemant Mishra/Mint
The ideal way of demonstrating a bank’s growth is growth in assets and not “total business”—a metric no bank uses in any part of the globe except India. Photo: Hemant Mishra/Mint



Live Mint :Tamal Bandyopadhyay  :  Tue, Apr 02 2013. 02 08 PM IST

It will be nice to see banks claiming zero NPAs,
 or highest margins,
instead of talking on meaningless total business


Some Indian banks—both state-run as well as private—have started screaming from the rooftops about how well they have been doing.
Canara Bank’s total business has crossed Rs.6 trillion and that of Indian Overseas Bank has crossed Rs.3.5 trillion.
The total business figure for Oriental Bank of Commerce is Rs.3 trillion; Dena Bank Rs.1.5 trillion; Federal Bank Ltd Rs.1 trillion and South Indian Bank Ltd Rs.75,000 crore.
They have all been splashing their ads across national dailies for the past few weeks. And, there are too many zeros in their ads to make them look impressive and cover the breadth of a paper, across columns. So, instead of saying Canara Bank’s total business has crossed Rs.6 trillion, or Rs.6 lakh crore, the ad copy prefers to use the figure—Rs.6,00,000,00,00,000. This possibly demonstrates better the scale of the bank’s achievement.
In a slowing economy, growth of business is indeed credible and these banks’ obsession for zeroes could perhaps be traced back to the fact that the concept of zero is India’s contribution to the world of mathematics. (Well, who has not heard of Indian mathematician and astronomer Aryabhata?) But what is more intriguing is the banks’ obsession for so-called “total business”.
What is total business? It is deposits mobilized from the public plus loans given to borrowers. Banks raise money from the public in the form of deposits and this, along with capital, reserves and money borrowed from the market, support their loan and investment growth. While money thus raised—both from depositors as well as borrowings from other sources, including other banks—is a bank’s liability, loans and investments are assets. The ideal way of demonstrating a bank’s growth is growth in assets and not “total business”—a metric no bank uses in any part of the globe except India.
Why don’t banks add investments, too, to show the bulge of their total business? It could be because of the fact that historically, investments in government bonds are statutory (as part of the statutory liquidity ratio, or SLR) and, hence, banks do not take pride in this business.
The concept of total business is baseless. Whom do the banks want to impress by their total business—the consumers, owners or investors? The consumers do not care about the scale of business; they are concerned about the quality and reach of service. The owner and the investors are probably more interested in knowing the financial ratios such as return on assets, return on equity, price-to-book value or, say, bad assets as a percentage of loans and net interest margin (NIM)—the spread between a bank’s cost of deposits and earnings from loans. These metrics demonstrate the efficiency of a bank.
It will be nice to see a bank claiming to be a zero-NPA (non-performing assets) bank, or the bank with the highest NIM, instead of playing with so many zeroes and talking about meaningless total business. If they want to focus on scale, total assets are a better parameter. Incidentally, the total assets of the entire Indian banking system are less than those held by each of the four largest Chinese banks.
Banker’s Trust Realtime is a frequent blog by Tamal Bandyopadhyay, who writes a popular weekly column Banker’s Trust.

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Steep rise in NPAs









Source :rediff com:22 Nov 2011


Bad loans are turning nightmarish for Indian banks. A steep rise in interest rates over the past 18 months has led to a sharp increase in non-performing assets.


Non-performing assets, or NPAs, are assets which are categorised by a bank or a financial institution as sub-standard, doubtful or loss assets as they do not yield any returns to them.


The Reserve Bank of India has increased its lending (repo) rate 13 times since March, 2010 to tame inflation.


Moody's has assigned Baa3, the lowest investment grading rating, to India. The rating agency downgraded the outlook for the Indian banking system to 'negative' from 'stable' saying that economic slowdown would impact asset quality, capitalisation and profitability.


However, Standard & Poor's upgraded the Indian banking sector saying its domestic regulations are in line with international standards and said the Reserve Bank has a moderately successful track record.


The gross non-performing assets (NPAs) of 37 listed banks has gone up to Rs 1.06 lakh crore (Rs 1.06 trillion) during the September quarter from Rs 79,078 crore (Rs 790.78 billion) in the corresponding period last year.


The banks are also under pressure from loans outgoes to the sectors facing inordinate delays in execution of projects, raising concerns over the companies' ability to repay loans on time.


Loans given to mining, power and realty companies might become NPAs for the banking sector due to the delay in completion of projects.


1. State Bank of India 


Net NPAs: Rs 12,347.90 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 25,326.29 crore


The gross non-performing assets (NPAs) of public sector banks increased by 20 per cent during June-September 2011.


Standard & Poor's, which had in September downgraded standalone ratings of State Bank of India, said high credit risks in the Indian banking sector reflects that the country has a weak payment culture and legal system that often result in low recoveries and delayed settlement of foreclosures.


(NPA figures are for the year ended March 2011, Source: RBI)




2. ICICI Bank


Net NPAs: Rs 2,407.36 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 10,034.26 crore


ICICI Bank has the highest NPAs among private sector banks. ICICI Bank has slightly improved its net bad debts to 0.90 per cent from 0.91 per cent in the earlier quarter.


Indian banks face challenges like increase in interest rates on saving deposits, a tighter monetary policy, restructured loan accounts and increasing infrastructure loans.


3. Canara Bank


Net NPAs: Rs 2,347.33 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 3,089.21 crore


Canara Bank's gross NPA ratio increased to 1.73 per cent (Rs 3,793 crore) for the quarter ending September 30 from 1.49 per cent (Rs 2,636 crore) in the year-ago period. The net NPA ratio stood at 1.43 per cent (Rs 3,117 crore) in September.


4. Punjab National Bank 


Net NPAs: Rs 2,038.63 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 4,379.39 crore


The NPAs of Punjab National Bank (PNB) rose by 29 per cent during the July-September quarter to Rs 5,150 crore.


5. Bank of India


Net NPAs: Rs 1944.99 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 4,811.55 crore


The bank's gross non-performing assets (npas) stood at 3.02 per cent, up 33 basis points sequentially, while net NPAs stood at 1.98 per cent, up 71 basis points sequentially.


6. UCO Bank 


Net NPAs: Rs 1,824.55 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 3,150.36 crore


As NPAs mount, UCO Bank is eyeing a 20 per cent growth in its business and a reduction in its non-performing assets (NPAs) to less than 3 per cent in FY12.


7. Union Bank of India


Net NPAs: Rs 1,803.44 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 3,622.82 crore


The system based NPA recognition method has led to a rise NPAs. Compared to the manual method, the system based study gives an accurate picture of bad loans. 


However, the Union Bank is optimistic about cutting down NPAs. It expects gross NPAs to be below 3 per cent in the coming quarter.


8. IDBI Bank


Net NPAs: Rs 1,677.91 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 2,784.73 crore


While IDBI's gross NPA rose to 2.47 per cent from 1.88 per cent, net NPA shot up to 1.57 from 1.19 per cent in the second quarter.


9. Indian Overseas Bank 


Net NPAs: Rs 1,328.42 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 3,089.59 crore




The gross NPA stood at Rs 3,090 crore in March 2011, as against Rs 3,611 crore in March 2010. 


In percentage terms, the gross NPA ratio was 2.72 per cent as on March 2011 compared to 4.47 per cent in March 2010.


10. Syndicate Bank


Net NPAs: Rs 1,030.84 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 2,598.97 crore




While the net non-performing assets (NPAs) increased to Rs 1,052 crore for the second quarter ended September, as against Rs 917 crore in the year-ago period, the percentage of net NPA declined marginally to 0.93 per cent, as against 0.97 per cent in the same period last year.


11. Oriental Bank of Commerce


Net NPAs: Rs 938.15 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 1,920.54 crore


Oriental Bank of Commerce saw more than 50 per cent rise in NPAs in the September quarter
.
12. Central Bank of India


Net NPAs: Rs 847 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 2,394 crore


In the July-September quarter, the bank's gross non-performing assets (NPA) as a percentage of total advances rose to 2.94 per cent from 2.28 per cent in the same quarter a year ago.


Its net NPAs rose to 1.37 per cent of total loans from 0.68 per cent in the year-ago period.


13. Bank of Baroda 


Net NPAs: Rs 790.88 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 3,152.50 crore


The Bank succeeded in restricting its incremental delinquency ratio to 1.09 per cent, gross NPAs to 1.36 per cent and net NPAs to 0.35 per cent during 2010-11. 


The Bank's Loan Loss Coverage Ratio (including technical write-offs) too stood at the healthy level of 85 per cent as on 31st March 2011.


14. United Bank of India


Net NPAs: Rs 757.41 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 1,355.78 crore


United Bank of India has introduced a system of monitoring the collection of NPA and collecting information all branches. 


It has also recruited more recovery agents for faster recovery of NPAs.


15. Vijaya Bank


Net NPAs: Rs 741.16 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 1,355.78 crore


Banks have been witnessing substantial bad loans in the agricultural sector.


16. Allahabad Bank


Net NPAs: Rs 736.37 cr
Gross NPAs: Rs 1,647.92 cr


A large portion of the NPAs are from agriculture and SME sector. The bank is hopeful of a fast recovery in the next six months


17. State Bank of Patiala


Net NPAs: Rs 620.77 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 1,381.68 crore


The business of State Bank of Patiala has grown manifold since its establishment. There are more than 1000 branches of SBP.


18. Bank of Maharashtra


Net NPAs: Rs 618. 95 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 1,173.70 crore


Bank of Maharashtra is now taking fresh initiatives to further bring it down to 2 per cent this fiscal. 


From Rs 1,468 crore in September 2010, the gross NPA of the bank was slashed to Rs 1,174 crore as on March 31, 2011.


19. State Bank of Hyderabad


Net NPAs: Rs 562.72 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 1,150.45 crore


State Bank of Hyderabad's fiscal second quarter (July-September) net profit fell 12.27% to Rs 232 crore from Rs 264 crore in the same period a year ago due to high interest expenditure and increased provisioning for bad loans.


Net NPAs of the bank during the quarter rose to 1.92% as against 0.64% in the same period last fiscal year.


20. Dena Bank


Net NPAs: Rs 54.89 crore
Gross NPAs: Rs 842.24 crore


The bank expects to have a net non-performing asset (NPA) ratio of 1.6 per cent to 1.7 per cent for FY11.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

NPA may go up 25bps but margins to be up 4%: HDFC Bank






Source:CNBC-TV 18 :Sep 13,2011:

Increase in non-performing assets is the greatest danger banks faces in the near-term. In fact, experts say that the market has already discounted the RBI action expected on September 16th, but fear of growing bad loans plagues the banking space.
Speaking to CNBC-TV18 in an exclusive interview, Aditya Puri, managing director of HDFC Bank says that a marginal increase in NPA is a possibility, but it is not alarming. “NPAs may go up by 25bps, but it is not a major concern,” he says. He sees no stress on the bank’s portfolio for now and is not too concerned about asset quality or fee-based income at this point.
“Margins will most likely remain between 3.9% and 4.3% and we expect credit growth to continue to be around 25-30%,” he says.
On the broader economy, he says that GDP could come down to 7.5% from 8.5%. “Growth at the end of FY12 could be closer to 8% as we near the end of the rate hike cycle,” he says. He reiterated that rates are, however, unlikely to begin declining before FY12.
Below is the edited transcript. 
Q: The concern for the market has been that this year might be challenging for private and public sector banks with asset quality, given where interest rates are and the general economic environment. Do you see that as a problem for the sector?
A: Frankly no. We must understand that when we are talking about a slow down we are talking about a marginal slowdown at best. A slow down from 8.5% to even 7.5% is not such that it will cause major concerns on the activity side.
As far as the interest rate is concerned, yes, whenever the interest rate rises and the economy slows down there is some marginal increase in NPAs. But it is not a cause for alarm.
The other issue that people have expressed is concern about certain projects. Some of the projects may face some difficulty or restructuring, but I do not think on an overall basis, the increase in NPAs would be such that it should be a cause of concern in terms of the absorption capacity of the banks.
Q: Would you say that is a warranted fear that some of these pockets such as SEBs or agri-lending are opening up greater pressure than banks earlier thought they might be?
A: I think some of these concerns feed on themselves. I remember in 2008, there were a couple of analysts who NPAs in India would double! I think you should have an audit on the projections of the analysts as well.
Now, as far as agriculture is concerned, we have a good harvest; we have talked about certain issues forever, but we haven’t seen that much of a spike. Let me repeat again, you will see some spike, but gross NPAs are three for the system, net NPAs are about 0.9. They could go up about 25 basis points here and there.
So yes, there will be a marginal increase but all that has happened from 8.5% to 7.5%, there is a good agricultural harvest. I don’t think there will be that many problems and when you talk about SEBs, yes there could be some issues, but they will be worked out over the long run. Frankly, the demand for power is there. So everything doesn’t necessarily have to fall back into an NPA.
Q: The competitive environment has gotten much more intense for banks such as yours – is that a real threat aside from slippages that growth itself may be coming off?
A: Some growth will definitely come off. If the GDP goes from 8.5% to 7.5%, there is a multiplier of credit growth-to-GDP, which is about 2.5%. That amount of growth will come down. But if your question is on HDFC Bank, no, we are not that concerned. You must understand the way our balance sheet is structured- it is 50% retail, 50% corporate, and we are not that much in infrastructure where you have seen some amount of slowdown. So will the growth slowdown from the level of about 29-30%? Possible, but we normally say we will be between the 25-30%, and I do not see any reason for a problem there. We are seeing no stress on our portfolio for now.
Q: Any issues about margins propping up during the course of the year given the high level of deposits or rate of deposits?
A: I was wondering when you would also get worried.
Q: Not worried, I want to hear reassuring things from you...
A: Okay. On the margins, there would be some pressure but I think a large amount of the pressure is over because I don’t think any bank is increasing their deposit rates at this point of time. In fact, even if there is, say, 25 basis points increase in the rate by the RBI, I don’t think given the fact that in our view the interest rate cycle is peaking out, there will be a pass on of that increase.
Q: Let me ask you about the fee-income side of the business. How would that do in a scenario where things are a little bit more sluggish?
A: That depends on the composition of your fees. If a large portion of your fees were from mergers, acquisitions and projects, then yes, you would have some strain. We are not major in infrastructure projects; our fee is spread across about 20 lines. So there will be some impact on the fees but not anything to be concerned about.
Q: Which one would you say is the one HDFC is most keenly focused on over the next couple of quarters – whether or not growth can remain intact, whether margins may come under pressure, or the much talked about risk of slippages?
A: We do not have major concerns with growth. We feel that at a worst case scenario, unless no actions are taken in Delhi, you will still at least have a 7.5% to 8% growth. You take a multiplier of 2.5% and that comes to about 18-18.5%. We grow a couple of percentage, maybe 5-6%, by gaining market share. We see no change in that scenario.
As far as our margins are concerned, we have always said we’ll be in the range of 3.9-4.3%.
As far as slippages are concerned, our portfolio, even for us, has behaved surprisingly well. So I do not think that is a concern in the short term. In the long term, I have always said that in financial services, India offers the best opportunity. Demand exceeds supply here. I don’t see any reason to change my views.
Q: How much do you think growth may actually get impacted by on the GDP level due to the consecutive rate hikes by RBI? Are people being alarmist when they talk about a sub-7% rate or would you say observing what you have seen in the economy that could be a reality?
A: As of now, we do seem to base our analysis on a lot of statistics, which in some cases, go year-on-year, and shouldn’t be that much cause of alarm. If you look at the tax collections etc, then the GDP rate seems to be quite fine. Either way, we have had a GDP growth rate of about 7.7% and this is without any investment demand kicking in.
My own view is, given what the government has been saying, you will see investment spending, you will see a better second half, you will see better growth in agriculture and in services. You may see some reduction in industrial growth.
So overall, I would say somewhere between 7.5-8.5% while the rest of the country have been doing fine and everybody takes pride. I think the government is now very sure that they are going to contribute to this growth. So if we get investment going, I would be close to the 8% with 25 basis points here or there.
Q: I heard you say that even if there is a rate increase from the Reserve Bank, it might not get translated. Would you go as far as to say that lending and deposit rates in the system has topped off then for private banks like yours?
A: I would say not only for private sector banks, you have also seen State Bank announce their schemes under car loans. We probably have to content with, but the issue is, I do believe that we are at the end of our inflation period and RBI has intent to control inflation. However, we will see a high inflation number, so they may not have an option but to raise it by about 25 basis points.
To answer your question, yes, we are at the turning point of the cycle and you will see declining interest rates. You will see competition in the market, so it will be very unlikely that the banks raise rates and deposit rates.
Q: What is your best guess of when interest rates actually begin a down cycle again?
A: Not before the next fiscal year.
Q: Is that April or is that further away?
A: If I was that good, I would be sitting home and making money.
Q: The second part of your statement is probably true.
A: Let me give you my reasoning behind this. Basically, as a combination of what is happening globally, to commodity prices, to oil prices plus the agriculture harvest that we are going to have and the base effect, you would probably see inflation down to about 7% odd category by March. Everything else remaining equal, I think you can start to see some investment as well. The emphasis shift from inflation-control to growth and that’s where whether it’s in the April quarter or it’s in the July quarter, I really don’t know, but downward, it will come.
Q: How much of a come down do you expect on corporate rates, the one that is really hurting the equity market as well?
A: Here again, lot of people cry wolf and that is a bit of an issue. If you take the consumer goods industry, interest forms 4% of sale. So 2% increase on 4%, I am sure that is not the end of the world.
As far as infrastructure is concerned, it is a 7-10 years cycle and interest rate goes up and interest rates go down. On an average basis, they will achieve the same. Yes, interest rate is a factor, but as I was talking to Deosthalee, it is not the only factor. To me, more important than interest rate for infrastructure etc is, to get the other things right like land acquisition, supply of raw material and speedy implementation of projects.
That said, I also think interest rates will come down, you will see an overall decline in the yield-curve once inflation is brought under control. I do not think anybody can’t take this much of a hit. Too much is made of interest rates being the sole functionary of slow down

Saturday, August 6, 2011

Be vigilant to check NPAs; don't choke credit: FM to banks


Source :PTI:Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 16:25





Concerned over rising Non- performing Assets (NPAs) of public sector lenders, Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee today said banks must tackle the problem seriously but without choking credit.
"NPAs in public sector banks have witnessed an upward trend. I had a meeting with chiefs of these banks and drew their attention. I asked them to take care of it. I told them not to choke credit but apply due diligence while sanctioning loans," he told the Lok Sabha during Question Hour.
The gross NPAs of the public sector banks have risen to Rs 78,119 crore as on June this year compared to Rs 44,039 crore in March 2009.
Mukherjee also asked the banks to follow a balanced approach and said there should not be any undue delay in sanctioning of loans.
He assured the House that Indian banking system was strong. "We have seen how the big banks in the world have collapsed (2008) like pack of cards, but Indian banks survived".
This doesn't mean that NPAs should be allowed to rise. "We are always vigilant. But we should not do anything wherein banks start refusing loans to needy," he said.
Expressing concern, Members said the NPAs were rising due to various factors like lack of proper due diligence while giving loans to firms and also rising interest rates.
Meanwhile, replying to a supplementary, Minister of State for Finance Namo Narain Meena said that risk management system has been strengthened and all possible precautions are being taken while sanctioning loan.

Monday, May 30, 2011

Banks are shifting to a technology-based platform to calculate non-performing assets (NPAs) in the fourth quarter






Source : The Telegraph: Monday , May 30 , 2011



Mumbai, May 29: PSU banks are shifting to a technology-based platform to calculate non-performing assets (NPAs) in the fourth quarter — a period the lenders reported fresh defaults and made higher provisioning for bad loans.

Bankers and analysts said the shift to the new platform was one of the main reasons for the rise in bad assets during the fourth quarter.

The new technology is part of the banks’ core banking solution (CBS), replacing the earlier practice of tracking bad loans manually.

According to the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) norms, if either the interest or the principal on a loan is overdue for more than 90 days, the account becomes NPA.

Banks have to make provisions, or set aside funds, against such loans.

Last year, the finance ministry had directed PSU banks to identify bad loans with the help of technology rather than manually. The ministry had asked the banks to migrate to such a system by March 31.

This deadline has now been extended till September because of software-related problems.
Indian Bank began moving to the new system from April last year, while the Bank of India, Canara Bank, Andhra Bank are in various stages of implementation with agricultural loans and advances up to Rs 50 lakh yet to come under the platform.

Bankers say by September, the remaining loans will be covered.
Under the technology-based platform, NPAs are tracked on a daily basis through the use of computers.

Bankers pointed out that the earlier practice gave some discretion to the officials, which might have led to lower NPAs.

However, in the system-generated method, NPAs are immediately identified. This is one of the reasons why PSU banks adopting the new system have shown a rise in bad loans.
“It (the new method) certainly leads to transparency and prevents any form of manipulation. Moreover, it gives an accurate picture compared with the manual intervention,’’ says a senior official of the Bank of Baroda (BoB).

A significant part of BoB’s loans are now under the new method.

Manish Karwa, M.B. Mahesh and Nischint Chawathe, banking analysts at Kotak Institutional Equities, recently said in a note that bulk of the slips in the fourth quarter was because of the efforts made by public sector banks towards a stringent recognition platform for non-performing loans that disallowed any manual intervention.

The analysts warned of fresh defaults in the next two quarters.

“We expect more slippages in the first half 2011-12 from this transition as most public sectors are yet to fully complete the transition of their overall loan portfolio.”