Tuesday, July 23, 2013

RBI tightens gold import norms, prices may go up




PTI    New Delhi   Last Updated: July 23, 2013  | 09:15 IST

Seeking to tighten gold imports in the face of a widening CAD, the Reserve Bank of India on Monday set stringent conditions for importers, linking inward shipments to future exports, a decision that will make it costlier.

Under a notification issued by the RBI, banks and authorised agencies will have to ensure that at least 20 per cent of imported gold is made available for exports.

The importers, it said, will be required to keep 20 per cent of the consignment with customs bonded warehouses.

"It shall be incumbent on all nominated banks/nominated agencies to ensure that at least one fifth of every lot of import of gold (in any form/purity including import of gold coins/dore) is exclusively made available for the purpose of export.

"Further, they shall make available gold in any form for domestic use only to entities engaged in jewellery business/ bullion dealers supplying gold to jewellers," the RBI said.

The RBI said banks and other authorised entities will be permitted to undertake fresh imports of gold only after the exports have taken place to the extent of at least 75 per cent of gold remaining in the customs bonded warehouse.

Traders and jewellers said the restriction is likely to make gold costlier in the coming days.

"As the government has made it mandatory to export 20 per cent of imported gold, the exporter will be under pressure to export at any given price. If there is any export loss, the exporter will try recover it from domestic sales," Bombay Bullion Association ex-President Suresh Hundia said. 

However, exporters hailed the RBI move, saying gold availability for exports will increase.

Gems and Jewellery Export Promotion Council Chairman Vipul Shah said: "The ratio of 80:20 is a welcome step. It means 80 per cent of imported gold would be available for domestic use, while 20 per cent of it would be exported. This step will boost exports and foreign revenue."

The restriction comes when gold imports, in addition to oil, are putting pressure on the current account deficit, which soared to record high of 4.8 per cent in 2012-13

Govt to buy its own stake in 7 sick cos for Re 1



FP Editors Jul 23, 2013
As a promoter and owner of companies, the government has a number of conveniences, the most important being it need not be bothered about corporate governance at all.
A number of instances in the past have proved that and state-owned LIC’s is a classic case. There have been umpteen instances when the insurance giant was forced to buy stakes in public sector companies and banks only to save the government’s face. (Remember theONGC stake sale a couple of years back in which LIC had to subscribe to 90 percent of the shares offered?)
Reuters

The government is once again planning to make use of its convenience of being a promoter. Hard pressed to meet the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s deadline on cutting promoter holding, the government has devised a strategy to buy its own stake in loss making companies for just Re 1 per share.
According to a report in theEconomic Times, the government is planning to set up a fund especially for this. 
The fund will buy shares of seven loss making companies namely,
 Scooters India, HMT, 
Hindustan Photofilms, The Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd (FACT),
 Andrew Yule, ITI Ltd and State Trading Corporation.
As per the Sebi directive, public sector companies should have at least 10 percent public holding by 2 August.
The government is talking to the market regulator to treat the arrangement as an institutional placement, the report says quoting a government official.
But what is the logic behind the move?
“The government is hopeful that some of these companies will turn around and, hence, there is no need of a fire sale. At the opportune time, we will divest our stake in these firms,” the official has told the newspaper.
Should we say it is a smart move though at the cost of corporate governance?
 Not yet because there is no reason to believe yet that FACT, ITI etc will turn around in the near future.